Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("DISTANCE INTERPERSONNELLE")

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 122

  • Page / 5
Export

Selection :

  • and

SU ALCUNI TIPI DI RAPPORTI INTERINDIVIDUALI. DIFFERENZIAZIONE DELLE RIPOSTE SESSUALI IN TRESE ALLE RELATIVE VARIAZIONI DELLE DISTRUZE ESISTENTI TRA I DUE PARTNERS IMPEGNATI NEL COITO E TRA I LORO COMPONENTI = QUELQUES TYPES DE RAPPORTS INTERINDIVIDUELS. DIFFERENCES DE LA REPONSE SEXUELLE EN RAPPORT AVEC LES VARIATIONS DE DISTANCE ENTRE LES PARTENAIRES D'UN COITRESTA G.1972; MINERVA PSICHIATR. PSICOL.; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 175-181; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

EYE CONTACT, INTERPERSONAL DISTANCE, AND THE EQUILIBRIUM THEORY.RUSSO NF.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 497-502; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ETHOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGYLA BARRE W.1972; SEMISTICA; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1972; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 83-96; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

AVOIDANCE OF AN ACT WHICH WOULD VIOLATE PERSONAL SPACE = EVITEMENT D'UNE ACTION VIOLANT L'ESPACE PERSONNELBAREFOOT JC; HOOPLE H; MCCLAY D et al.1972; PSYCHON. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 205-206; BIBL. 7REF.Article

PERCEIVED INTIMACY, PHYSICAL DISTANCE AND EYE CONTACT = INTIMITE PERCUE, DISTANCE PHYSIQUE ET CONTACT VISUELSCHERER SE; SCHIFF MR.1973; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 835-841; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

STYLE OF ADAPTATION TO EXPERIENCED AVERSIVE MATERNAL CONTROL AND INTERPERSONAL DISTANCING FOLLOWING FAILURE = MODE D'ADAPTATIONS AU CONTROLE MATERNEL SUBI DE FACON AVERSIVE ET ATTITUDE DE RETRAIT FAISANT SUITE A UN ECHECHEILBRUN AB JR.1972; J. NERV. MENTAL DIS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 155; NO 3; PP. 177-183; BIBL. 13REF.Article

ON THE VALIDITY OF PROJECTIVE MEASURES OF INTERPERSONAL DISTANCEEDWARDS DJA.1980; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 43-50; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PERSONAL SPACE AS A MEASURE OF A DYING CHILD'S SENSE OF ISOLATION = ESPACE PERSONNEL COMME MESURE DU SENS DE L'ISOLEMENT CHEZ DES ENFANTS MOURANTSSPINETTA JJ; RIGLER D; KARON M et al.1974; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 42; NO 6; PP. 751-756; BIBL. 22REF.Article

A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ORGANISMS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIESHARRISON PR.1974; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 91; NO 2; PP. 269-271; BIBL. 7REF.Article

GAZE, MUTUAL GAZE, AND PROXIMITY = LE REGARD, LE REGARD RECIPROQUE ET LA PROXIMITEARGYLE M; INGHAM R.1972; SEMIOTICA; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1972; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 32-49; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

INTERPERSONAL SPEAKING DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, SEX AND RELATIONSHIP = LA DISTANCE DE PAROLE INTERPERSONNELLE EN FONCTION DE L'AGE, DU SEXE ET DE LA RELATIONHESHKA S; NELSON Y.1972; SOCIOMETRY; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 491-498; BIBL. 14REF.Article

A FIELD EXPERIMENT ON THE EFFECT OF POLITICAL AND CULTURAL FACTORS ON THE USE OF PERSONAL SPACE = UNE EXPERIENCE SUR LE TERRAIN CONCERNANT L'EFFET DES FACTEURS POLITIQUES ET CULTURELS SUR L'USAGE DE L'ESPACE PERSONNELTHAYER S; ALBAN L.1972; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 267-272; BIBL. 15REF.Article

FREE TREES AND BIDIRECTIONAL TREES AS REPRESENTATIONS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE.CUNNINGHAM JP.1978; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 165-188; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL VARIATIONS IN MEASURING INTERPERSONAL DISTANCE BY MEANS OF REPRESENTATIONAL SPACE. = EFFETS DES VARIATIONS DE PROCEDURES DANS LA MESURE DE LA DISTANCE INTERPERSONNELLE AU MOYEN DE L'ESPACE REPRESENTATIONNELTOLOR A.1975; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 36; NO 2; PP. 475-491; BIBL. 3 P.Article

THE ECOLOGY OF COMMITTEES.GREEN CS III.1975; ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 411-427; BIBL. 1 P.Article

ELIMINATING THE BIASING EFFECTS OF SOCIAL DISTANCE IN CROSS-CULTURAL SURVEY RESEARCH PROJECTSSUTCLIFFE CR.1974; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 94; NO 1; PP. 141-142; BIBL. 4REF.Article

SOCIAL DISTANCE AS CATEGORIZATION OF INTERGROUP INTERACTION = LA DISTANCE SOCIALE COMME CATEGORISATION DE L'INTERACTION INTERGROUPESHERIF CW.1973; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 327-334; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ON INTERPERSONAL DISTANCE = EFFETS DE L'EVALUATION DE LA PERFORMANCE SUR LA DISTANCE INTERPERSONNELLEKARABENICK SA; MEISELS M.1972; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 275-286; BIBL. 19REF.Article

THE RELATION BETWEEN HIERARCHICAL AND EUCLIDEAN MODELS FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCESHOLMAN EW.1972; PSYCHOMETRIKA; E.U.; DA. 1972; VOL. 37; NO 4, PART 1; PP. 417-423; BIBL. 5 REF.Serial Issue

AFFECTIVE ROLE ENACTMENT AND EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR = LE JEU DE ROLE AFFECTIF ET LE COMPORTEMENT D'EXPRESSIONFROMME DK; SCHMIDT CK.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 413-419; BIBL. 1 P.Article

PERCEPTION OF SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES AMONG ETHNIC GROUPS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GUAM = LA PERCEPTION DES RESSEMBLANCES ET DES DIFFERENCES PARMI LES GROUPES ETHNIQUES A L'UNIVERSITE DE GUAMBRISLIN RW; WILSON WS.1971; MICRONESICA; U.S.A.; DA. 1971; VOL. 7; NO 1-2; PP. 19-26; BIBL. 10REF.Article

THE SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF INTERPERSONAL DISTANCES AS A FUNCTION OF LINGUISTIC STYLES.LEGINSKI W; IZZETT RR.1976; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 99; NO 1; PP. 125-137; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

COMPLEXITY OF EFFECTS OF PERSONAL SPACE = COMPLEXITE DES EFFETS DE L'ESPACE PERSONNELGROSSNICKLE WF; LAO RC; MARTOCCIA CT et al.1975; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 36; NO 1; PP. 237-238; BIBL. 6REFArticle

INITIAL INTERACTION DISTANCE AMONG INDIVIDUALS EQUAL AND UNEQUAL IN MILITARY RANK.DEAN LM; WILLIS FN; HEWITT J et al.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 32; NO 2; PP. 294-299; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

PROJECTED SOCIAL DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF PRAISE CONDITIONS AND STATUS ORIENTATION: COMPARISON WITH PHYSICAL INTERPERSONAL SPACING IN THE LABORATORY.ADLER LL; IVERSON MA.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 41; NO 2; PP. 659-664; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

  • Page / 5